Blog / EFT & Breathwork

EFT Tapping: What the Research Actually Says

EFT has clinical evidence that most people don't know about. Multiple randomised controlled trials show it reduces cortisol by up to 43%. Here is the research, how it might work, and how to try it.

The first time most people hear about EFT tapping, they are sceptical. You tap on points on your face and collarbone while talking about what is bothering you. It looks unusual. It sounds unlikely. And the name, Emotional Freedom Technique, does not help.

That scepticism is fair. But the clinical evidence behind EFT is considerably stronger than its reputation suggests, and it is worth understanding what the research actually shows rather than dismissing it on appearance alone.

What EFT is

Emotional Freedom Technique was developed by Gary Craig in the 1990s, drawing on earlier work by Roger Callahan (Thought Field Therapy). The basic protocol involves two elements working together: cognitive exposure and acupressure tapping.

The cognitive element is a setup phrase, usually something like: “Even though I feel this anxiety about my presentation, I deeply and completely accept myself.” You name the problem directly rather than avoiding it.

While you hold the problem in mind, you tap with your fingertips on a sequence of points on the body: the side of the hand, the eyebrow, the side of the eye, under the eye, under the nose, the chin, the collarbone, under the arm, and the top of the head. These correspond to points used in traditional Chinese acupressure, though the mechanism through which EFT works is not primarily explained by acupressure theory.

The research

A 2012 randomised controlled trial by Dawson Church, Garret Yount, and Audrey Brooks compared EFT, talk therapy, and no treatment on stress biomarkers. The EFT group showed a 24% reduction in cortisol after a single session, compared to 14% in the talk therapy group and no significant change in the control group. This was a direct measurement of the stress hormone, not a self-report.

A 2017 meta-analysis by Sebastian and Nelms reviewed 14 randomised controlled trials and found that EFT produced significant reductions in anxiety, depression, and PTSD symptoms, with large effect sizes comparable to CBT. The quality of studies has improved considerably since the early days of EFT research, and it now meets the criteria for an evidence-based intervention under the American Psychological Association's standards for PTSD treatment.

Multiple trials have also looked at specific populations: veterans with PTSD, healthcare workers under stress, students before exams, and people with phobias. The pattern holds across contexts.

“EFT is one of the most investigated treatments currently available for PTSD and shows a large treatment effect in a short period of time.”

Sebastian & Nelms, Explore: The Journal of Science and Healing, 2017

How it might work

The honest answer is that the full mechanism is not yet understood. Two competing explanations are currently most plausible.

The first is that the tapping itself stimulates the acupoints in ways that send calming signals to the amygdala (the brain's threat-detection centre). Church and Feinstein (2017) proposed that the physical stimulation interrupts the amygdala's threat response while the emotional content is being held in mind, effectively updating the association between the trigger and the fear response. This would be similar in mechanism to EMDR (Eye Movement Desensitisation and Reprocessing), where bilateral stimulation appears to help process traumatic memory.

The second explanation is simpler: that the somatic stimulation (any tapping or rhythmic touch) activates the relaxation response, and it is the combination of exposure to the feared stimulus plus a simultaneous calming of the body that drives the change. On this view, the specific points matter less than the act of deliberate physical contact during emotional processing.

Both explanations are consistent with the outcome data. The mechanism remains an active area of research.

What it will not fix

A few honest caveats.

EFT is not a replacement for psychiatric care or medication in cases of severe mental illness or acute crisis. For complex PTSD, working with a trained practitioner is important and self-directed tapping, while useful, is not sufficient on its own.

Some of the earlier EFT research had methodological limitations: small sample sizes, no active control conditions, and researchers with financial interest in positive results. The field has improved, but it is worth reading critically rather than taking all published EFT studies at face value.

And EFT is not magic. It works by addressing the physiological component of emotional distress. If the source of the distress is an ongoing situation that genuinely needs to change, no amount of tapping will substitute for making that change.

How to try it

The basic protocol is straightforward enough to try without a practitioner for everyday stress and anxiety. Here is a simple version:

For acute stress, one round often produces a noticeable shift within minutes. For deeper material, several sessions with a qualified practitioner are more appropriate.

I use EFT in every retreat I run. Not because it is fashionable, but because it consistently moves things that other approaches leave stuck. Watching someone tap through a fear they have carried for years and feel it dissolve in twenty minutes is still, even after many retreats, one of the most striking things I get to witness in this work.

Continue reading